An Empirical Comparison of DDF Detection Methods for Understanding the Causes of DIF in Multiple-Choice Items

Publisher： Routledge Ltd

E-ISSN： 1532-4818|28|1|48-67

ISSN： 0895-7347

Source： Applied Measurement in Education, Vol.28, Iss.1, 2015-01, pp. : 48-67

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

A stratified study of students' understanding of basic optics concepts in different contexts using two-tier multiple-choice items

By Chu Hye-Eun   Treagust David   Chandrasegaran A. L.  

Research in Science & Technological Education, Vol. 27, Iss. 3, 2009-11 ,pp. : 253-265

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Using Multiple-choice Tests to Evaluate Students' Understanding of Accounting

By Bible Lynn   Simkin Mark   Kuechler William  

Accounting Education, Vol. 17, Iss. 1, 2008-03 ,pp. : 55-68

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Assessment based on exercise work and multiple-choice tests

By Rød Jan ketil   Eiksund Sveinung   Fjær Olav  

Journal of Geography in Higher Education, Vol. 34, Iss. 1, 2010-02 ,pp. : 141-153

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Effects of Population Heterogeneity on Accuracy of DIF Detection

By      

Applied Measurement in Education, Vol. 27, Iss. 4, 2014-10 ,pp. : 286-300

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Acceptance by undergraduates of the immediate feedback assessment technique for multiple-choice testing

By Dibattista David   Mitterer John   Gosse Leanne  

Teaching in Higher Education, Vol. 9, Iss. 1, 2004-01 ,pp. : 17-28

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite