A comparison of the i‐gel™ and the PRO‐Breathe® laryngeal mask during pressure support ventilation in children

Publisher： John Wiley & Sons Inc

E-ISSN： 1365-2044|70|12|1412-1417

ISSN： 0003-2409

Source： ANAESTHESIA, Vol.70, Iss.12, 2015-12, pp. : 1412-1417

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

A comparison of fibreoptic‐guided tracheal intubation through the Ambu®Aura‐i™, the intubating laryngeal mask airway and the i‐gel™: a manikin study

By  

ANAESTHESIA, Vol. 70, Iss. 5, 2015-05 ,pp. : 591-597

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A randomized comparison of the i‐gel™ with the self‐pressurized air‐Q™ intubating laryngeal airway in children

By  

PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Vol. 25, Iss. 4, 2015-04 ,pp. : 405-412

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A comparative study of Laryngeal Mask Airway size 1 vs i‐gel size 1 in infants undergoing daycare procedures

By  

PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Vol. 25, Iss. 4, 2015-04 ,pp. : 386-391

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Chest compressions do not disrupt the seal created by the laryngeal mask airway during positive pressure ventilation: a preliminary porcine study

By  

Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 16, Iss. 5, 2014-07 ,pp. : 378-382

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Pro‐Seal laryngeal mask airway

By  

ANAESTHESIA, Vol. 57, Iss. 3, 2002-03 ,pp. : 288-289

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite