Empirically based comparisons of the reliability and validity of common quantification approaches for eyeblink startle potentiation in humans

Publisher： John Wiley & Sons Inc

E-ISSN： 1469-8986|52|12|1669-1681

ISSN： 0048-5772

Source： PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY (ELECTRONIC), Vol.52, Iss.12, 2015-12, pp. : 1669-1681

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Reliability and External Validity of Neurobiological Experiments

By Yan Wong Muk  

International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 27, Iss. 4, 2013-12 ,pp. : 429-446

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Translating the QABF to Spanish with an Eye Toward Reliability and Validity

By  

BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS, Vol. 30, Iss. 1, 2015-02 ,pp. : 65-72

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A meta‐analysis of interview length on reliability and validity

By  

JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, Vol. 91, Iss. 1, 2018-03 ,pp. : 1-32

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Reliability and validity of the Leuven Perceptual Organization Screening Test (L‐POST)

By  

JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, Vol. 9, Iss. 2, 2015-09 ,pp. : 271-298

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

SCHOOL ANXIETY INVENTORY: RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY EVIDENCE IN A SAMPLE OF SLOVENIAN ADOLESCENTS

By  

PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, Vol. 33-3085, Iss. 9, 2015-11 ,pp. : 860-873

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite