Related content

Reply [to “Comment on ‘Saw‐toothed variations of relative paleointensity and cumulative viscous remanence: Testing the records and the model’ by L. Meynadier, J.‐P. Valet, Y. Guyodo, and C. Richter”]

By  

Journal Of Geophysical Research, Vol. 105, Iss. B7, 2000-07 ,pp. : 16613-16616

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Saw‐toothed variations of relative paleointensity and cumulative viscous remanence: Testing the records and the model

By  

Journal Of Geophysical Research, Vol. 103, Iss. B4, 1998-04 ,pp. : 7095-7105

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comment on “Experimental reassessment of the Shaw paleointensity method using laboratory‐induced thermal remanent magnetization” by Y. Pan, J. Shaw, R. Zhu, and M. J. Hill

By  

Journal Of Geophysical Research, Vol. 108, Iss. B5, 2003-05 ,pp. : n/a-n/a

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comment on “A relative geomagnetic paleointensity stack from Ontong‐Java plateau sediments for the Matuyama” by Yvo S. Kok and Lisa Tauxe

By  

Journal Of Geophysical Research, Vol. 106, Iss. B6, 2001-06 ,pp. : 11013-11015

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Reply [to “Comment on ‘Electric field measurements at the magnetopause, 1, Observation of large convective velocities at rotational magnetopause discontinuities’ by T. L. Aggson, P. J. Gambardella, and N. C. Maynard”]

By  

Journal Of Geophysical Research, Vol. 90, Iss. A8, 1985-08 ,pp. : 7631-7633

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite