Related content

Comment on “Saw‐toothed variations of relative paleointensity and cumulative viscous remanence: Testing the records and the model” by L. Meynadier, J.‐P. Valet, Y. Guyodo, and C. Richter

By  

Journal Of Geophysical Research, Vol. 105, Iss. B7, 2000-07 ,pp. : 16609-16611

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Saw‐toothed variations of relative paleointensity and cumulative viscous remanence: Testing the records and the model

By  

Journal Of Geophysical Research, Vol. 103, Iss. B4, 1998-04 ,pp. : 7095-7105

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Reply to comment by Y. Yamamoto on “Experimental reassessment of the Shaw paleointensity method using laboratory‐induced thermal remanent magnetization”

By  

Journal Of Geophysical Research, Vol. 108, Iss. B5, 2003-05 ,pp. : n/a-n/a

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Reply [to “Comment on ‘Electric field measurements at the magnetopause, 1, Observation of large convective velocities at rotational magnetopause discontinuities’ by T. L. Aggson, P. J. Gambardella, and N. C. Maynard”]

By  

Journal Of Geophysical Research, Vol. 90, Iss. A8, 1985-08 ,pp. : 7631-7633

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Reply [to “Comment on ‘Magnetization of the oceanic crust: Thermoremanent magnetization or chemical remanent magnetization’ by C. A. Raymond and J. L. LaBrecque”]

By  

Journal Of Geophysical Research, Vol. 94, Iss. B3, 1989-03 ,pp. : 3049-3050

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite