Aggrieved No More: Is There a Need for Standing to Remove Unused Trade Marks?

Author： Batty Rob   Watts Richard  

Publisher： Legal Research Foundation Inc.

ISSN： 1173-5864

Source： New Zealand Law Review, Vol.2013, Iss.1, 2013-03, pp. : 1-34

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Conflicting Trade Marks in the EC: Demise of Common Origin

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 50, Iss. 2, 1991-07 ,pp. : 223-226

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Trade marks plus? the role of trade marks in the global economy and the danger of over-protection

By Griffiths Andrew  

Liverpool Law Review, Vol. 28, Iss. 1, 2007-04 ,pp. : 107-141

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Bailment—Possession—False Trade Description—Merchandise Marks Act, 1887

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 19, Iss. 2, 1961-11 ,pp. : 179-181

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Do We Need More Financial Integration?

By  

Applied Economics Quarterly, Vol. 60, Iss. 2, 2014-06 ,pp. : 115-121

Duncker & Humblot

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Administrative Law—Remedies—Person Aggrieved—Planning Permission

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 19, Iss. 1, 1961-04 ,pp. : 5-8

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite