Author: Watts Jacqueline H.
Publisher: James Nicholas Publishers
ISSN: 1323-577X
Source: Educational Practice and Theory, Vol.34, Iss.1, 2012-01, pp. : 65-79
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Postgraduate research education is multi-faceted incorporating the teaching of a range of skills and study behaviours. A key skill for doctoral students is that of scholarly writing that Aitchison (2009) argues is often difficult to teach, with students unclear about the standards required for doctoral work. One benchmark of standards of academic literacy is published outputs, with Kamler (2008) pressing for greater pedagogical attention to be given to writing for publication within doctoral education. However, the case for pursuing publication as part of doctoral research experience is subject to a number of variables. This discussion paper debates some of these variables to consider writing for publication within diverse doctoral education. Features of difference will be discussed to reveal that the choice of whether or not to `publish as you go' (Taylor & Beasley, 2005, p. 130) is influenced by the personal, disciplinary and institutional context that frames the doctoral undertaking.
Related content
The “Publish and Perish syndrome
Computer Assisted Language Learning, Vol. 25, Iss. 5, 2012-12 ,pp. :
Publish or Perish - an Extension
By Wells Murray
Accounting Education, Vol. 16, Iss. 3, 2007-09 ,pp. :