Traditional conclusions in footwear examinations versus the use of the Bayesian approach and likelihood ratio: a review of a recent UK appellate court decision

Author： Bodziak William J.  

Publisher： Oxford University Press

ISSN： 1470-8396

Source： Law, Probability and Risk, Vol.11, Iss.4, 2012-12, pp. : 279-287

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

How to assign a likelihood ratio in a footwear mark case: an analysis and discussion in the light of R v T

By Biedermann A.   Taroni F.   Champod C.  

Law, Probability and Risk, Vol. 11, Iss. 4, 2012-12 ,pp. : 259-277

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The robustness of a continuous likelihood approach to bayesian analysis of forensic glass evidence

By Curran J.M.   Buckleton J.   Triggs C.M.  

Forensic Science International, Vol. 104, Iss. 2, 1999-10 ,pp. : 91-103

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Survey of the conclusions drawn of similar footwear cases in various crime laboratories

By Majamaa H.   Ytti A.  

Forensic Science International, Vol. 82, Iss. 1, 1996-09 ,pp. : 109-120

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Apportionment of Damages for Contributory Negligence: Appellate Review, Relative Blameworthiness and Causal Potency

By  

Edinburgh Law Review, Vol. 19, Iss. 3, 2015-09 ,pp. : 367-373

Edinburgh University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The likelihood ratio as value of evidencemore than a question of numbers

By Nordgaard Anders   Rasmusson Birgitta  

Law, Probability and Risk, Vol. 11, Iss. 4, 2012-12 ,pp. : 303-315

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite