Period of time： 2013年4期
Publisher： Oxford University Press
Founded in： 2002
Total resources： 4
ISSN： 1470-8396
Subject： D9 Law
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Law, Probability and Risk,volume 11,issue 4
Menu
Access to resources
Recommend
By Biedermann A.,Taroni F.,Champod C. in (2012)
Law, Probability and Risk,volume 11,issue 4 , Vol. 11, Iss. 4, 2012-12 , pp.By Bodziak William J. in (2012)
Law, Probability and Risk,volume 11,issue 4 , Vol. 11, Iss. 4, 2012-12 , pp.Expressing evaluative forensic science opinions in a court of law
By Ligertwood Andrew,Edmond Gary in (2012)
Law, Probability and Risk,volume 11,issue 4 , Vol. 11, Iss. 4, 2012-12 , pp.The likelihood ratio as value of evidencemore than a question of numbers
By Nordgaard Anders,Rasmusson Birgitta in (2012)
Law, Probability and Risk,volume 11,issue 4 , Vol. 11, Iss. 4, 2012-12 , pp.How clear is transparent? Reporting expert reasoning in legal cases
By Sjerps Marjan J.,Berger Charles E.H. in (2012)
Law, Probability and Risk,volume 11,issue 4 , Vol. 11, Iss. 4, 2012-12 , pp.Discussion paper: The R v T controversy: forensic evidence, law and logic
Law, Probability and Risk,volume 11,issue 4 , Vol. 11, Iss. 4, 2012-12 , pp.Discussion paper: Hard cases make bad lawreactions to R v T
By Thompson William C. in (2012)
Law, Probability and Risk,volume 11,issue 4 , Vol. 11, Iss. 4, 2012-12 , pp.Reply to Hamer: The R v T controversy: forensic evidence, law and logic
By Biedermann A.,Taroni F.,Champod C. in (2012)
Law, Probability and Risk,volume 11,issue 4 , Vol. 11, Iss. 4, 2012-12 , pp.By Bodziak William J. in (2012)
Law, Probability and Risk,volume 11,issue 4 , Vol. 11, Iss. 4, 2012-12 , pp.
Previous
Next