A motion to exclude and the ‘fixed’ versus ‘flexible’ battery in ‘forensic’ neuropsychology: Challenges to the practice of clinical neuropsychology

Author： Bigler Erin D.

Publisher： Oxford University Press

ISSN： 0887-6177

Source： Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Vol.22, Iss.1, 2007-01, pp. : 45-51

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Commentary on “A motion to exclude and the ‘fixed’ versus ‘flexible’ battery in ‘forensic’ neuropsychology”

By Russell Elbert W.

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Vol. 22, Iss. 6, 2007-08 ,pp. : 787-790

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Practice of Forensic Neuropsychology Meeting Challenges in the Courtroom

By Horton Arthur MacNeill Caruso Lauren S. Hartman David E.

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Vol. 13, Iss. 6, 1998-08 ,pp. : 569-572

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Clinical practice of forensic neuropsychology: An evidence-based approach

By Demakis George J.

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Vol. 28, Iss. 3, 2013-05 ,pp. : 304-305

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Forensic Neuropsychology: Fundamentals and Practice.

By Gray N.

Brain, Vol. 123, Iss. 12, 2000-12 ,pp. : 2568-2569

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Clinical Myths of Forensic Neuropsychology

By Greiffenstein Manfred

The Clinical Neuropsychologist (Neuropsychology, Development and Cognition: Sec, Vol. 23, Iss. 2, 2009-02 ,pp. : 286-296

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite