Commentary on “A motion to exclude and the ‘fixed’ versus ‘flexible’ battery in ‘forensic’ neuropsychology”

ISSN： 0887-6177

Source： Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Vol.22, Iss.6, 2007-08, pp. : 787-790

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

A motion to exclude and the ‘fixed’ versus ‘flexible’ battery in ‘forensic’ neuropsychology: Challenges to the practice of clinical neuropsychology

By Bigler Erin D.

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Vol. 22, Iss. 1, 2007-01 ,pp. : 45-51

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Forensic Neuropsychology: A Scientific Approach

By Michael Williams J.

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Vol. 27, Iss. 4, 2012-06 ,pp. : 467-470

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Clinical Myths of Forensic Neuropsychology

By Greiffenstein Manfred

The Clinical Neuropsychologist (Neuropsychology, Development and Cognition: Sec, Vol. 23, Iss. 2, 2009-02 ,pp. : 286-296

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Forensic Neuropsychology: Fundamentals and Practice.

By Gray N.

Brain, Vol. 123, Iss. 12, 2000-12 ,pp. : 2568-2569

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A Status Report On the Practice of Forensic Neuropsychology

By Heilbronner Robert

The Clinical Neuropsychologist (Neuropsychology, Development and Cognition: Sec, Vol. 18, Iss. 2, 2004-05 ,pp. : 312-326

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite