Why delay the obvious need for milder forms of ovarian stimulation?

E-ISSN： 0268-1161|12|2|399-401

ISSN： 1460-2350

Source： Human Reproduction, Vol.12, Iss.2, 1997-02, pp. : 399-401

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

Continuing the debate on the obvious need for milder forms of ovarian stimulation.

By Feichtinger W

Human Reproduction, Vol. 12, Iss. 8, 1997-08 ,pp. : 1837-1838

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Milder ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo: a randomized controlled trial

By Baart Esther B. Martini Elena Eijkemans Marinus J. Van Opstal Diane Beckers Nicole G.M. Verhoeff Arie Macklon Nicolas S. Fauser Bart C.J.M.

Human Reproduction, Vol. 22, Iss. 4, 2007-04 ,pp. : 980-988

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The role of LH in ovarian stimulation

By Lévy Delphine P. Navarro José M. Schattman Glenn L. Davis Owen K.

Human Reproduction, Vol. 15, Iss. 11, 2000-11 ,pp. : 2258-2265

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Time to revolutionize ovarian stimulation

By Fleming Richard

Human Reproduction, Vol. 11, Iss. 12, 1996-12 ,pp. : 2579-2579

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Time to revolutionize ovarian stimulation

By Edwards Robert G. Lobo Rogerio Bouchard Phillipe

Human Reproduction, Vol. 11, Iss. 5, 1996-05 ,pp. : 917-919

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite