Announcing: PHRONESIS Supplementary Volume I

By  

Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 17, Iss. 2, 1972-01 ,pp. : 191-192

Brill

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Statement by Paul Edwards Concerning the Supplementary Volume of the Encyclopedia of Philosophy

By Edwards Paul  

Inquiry, Vol. 41, Iss. 1, 1998-03 ,pp. : 123-124

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

>“Virtue Makes the Goal Right”: Virtue and Phronesis in Aristotle’s Ethics

By Moss Jessica  

Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 56, Iss. 3, 2011-01 ,pp. : 204-261

Brill

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Are there any incorrigible empirical statements? 1 There is an excellent discussion of this question in A. J. Ayer's The Problem of Knowledge , Chapter 2, Sections (iv), (v), and (vi), which mentions almost all the relevant considerations. However, it seems to me to stress some of the less important points and merely to mention what I regard as the crucial argument. I refer to this discussion by the pages in the Pelican edition. The case against incorrigibility is argued also by J. L. Austin (against John Wisdom) in ‘Other Minds', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society , Supplementary Volume XX, reprinted in Austin's Philosophical Papers ; I refer to the pages in the latter publication. The question is raised again by the controversy between J. J. C. Smart and Kurt Baier about the status of pains and other sensations in A.J.P. , Vol. 40, No. 1, May, 1962.

By Mackie J.L.  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 41, Iss. 1, 1963-01 ,pp. : 12-28

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Supplementary Clerk: Social Epistemology as a Vocation

By Basbøll Thomas  

Social Epistemology, Vol. 26, Iss. 3-4, 2012-10 ,pp. : 435-451

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite