Judging Relative Importance: Direct Rating and Point Allocation Are Not Equivalent

Author： Doyle J.R.   Green R.H.   Bottomley P.A.  

Publisher： Academic Press

ISSN： 0749-5978

Source： Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol.70, Iss.1, 1997-04, pp. : 65-72

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Judging the Importance of Constant and Variable Candidate Causes: A Test of the Power PC Theory

By Drew Frederic Vallee-Tourangeau Robin A. Murphy Susan  

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, Vol. 51, Iss. 1, 1998-02 ,pp. : 65-84

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Feature importance in feature generation and typicality rating

By Vanoverberghe Veerle   Storms Gert  

The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 15, Iss. 1, 2003-01 ,pp. : 1-18

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Way beyond compare: Nonselective superiority and inferiority biases in judging randomly assigned group members relative to their peers

By Klar Y.  

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 38, Iss. 4, 2002-07 ,pp. : 331-351

Academic Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The relative importance of patients’ decisional control preferences and experiences

By Ghane Arezou   Huynh Ho Phi   Andrews Sara E.   Legg Angela M.   Tabuenca Arnold   Sweeny Kate  

Psychology and Health, Vol. 29, Iss. 10, 2014-10 ,pp. : 1105-1118

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite