data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ebbe5/ebbe5843c3d592c8b2a99a20f6f779a7409091b4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb24e/bb24e861984efc99265969295803fddd342d5bda" alt=""
Author: Parker L.D.
Publisher: Academic Press
ISSN: 1044-5005
Source: Management Accounting Research, Vol.13, Iss.1, 2002-03, pp. : 71-100
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
This paper presents the second stage of a field based case study focussed upon the planning and control concepts and processes employed by the central offices of the Victorian Synod of the Uniting Church in Australia. Its analysis is informed by grounded theory methodology and develops a micro-theoretical framework of that organization’s planning and control process. A reactive style of planning produces an incremental budgetary mélange that ultimately results in a form of control by compromise. The emergent findings are compared with a selection of relevant prior strategy and not-for-profit organization research. The study presents contextualized insights into the potential limits of ‘rational’ management system operation in such organizations, and the role of budgetary systems in organizational approaches to coping with a complex and dynamic environment.
Related content
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ebbe5/ebbe5843c3d592c8b2a99a20f6f779a7409091b4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb24e/bb24e861984efc99265969295803fddd342d5bda" alt=""
Reactive planning in a Christian Bureaucracy
By Parker L.D.
Management Accounting Research, Vol. 12, Iss. 3, 2001-09 ,pp. :
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ebbe5/ebbe5843c3d592c8b2a99a20f6f779a7409091b4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb24e/bb24e861984efc99265969295803fddd342d5bda" alt=""
By Peters B.
Public Organization Review, Vol. 10, Iss. 3, 2010-09 ,pp. :
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ebbe5/ebbe5843c3d592c8b2a99a20f6f779a7409091b4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb24e/bb24e861984efc99265969295803fddd342d5bda" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ebbe5/ebbe5843c3d592c8b2a99a20f6f779a7409091b4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb24e/bb24e861984efc99265969295803fddd342d5bda" alt=""
Measuring ‘tight budgetary control’
Management Accounting Research, Vol. 12, Iss. 1, 2001-03 ,pp. :
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ebbe5/ebbe5843c3d592c8b2a99a20f6f779a7409091b4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb24e/bb24e861984efc99265969295803fddd342d5bda" alt=""
Political economy of prudent budgetary policy
International Tax and Public Finance, Vol. 17, Iss. 3, 2010-06 ,pp. :