Two decades after legislation on identifiable donors in Sweden: are recipient couples ready to be open about using gamete donation?

By Isaksson S.   Skoog Svanberg A.   Sydsjö G.   Thurin-Kjellberg A.   Karlström P.-O.   Solensten N.-G.   Lampic C.  

Human Reproduction, Vol. 26, Iss. 4, 2011-04 ,pp. : 853-860

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Psychology and counselling. Counselling couples and donors for oocyte donation: the decision to use either known or anonymous oocytes

By Baetens P.   Devroey P.   Camus M.   Van Steirteghem A.C.  

Human Reproduction, Vol. 15, Iss. 2, 2000-02 ,pp. : 476-484

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

What are the effects of anonymity and secrecy on the welfare of the child in gamete donation?

By Shenfield F   Steele S J  

Human Reproduction, Vol. 12, Iss. 2, 1997-02 ,pp. : 392-395

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Anonymity and openness and the recruitment of gamete donors. Part 2: Oocyte donors

By Daniels Ken  

Human Fertility, Vol. 10, Iss. 4, 2007-12 ,pp. : 223-231

Informa Healthcare

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A flexible protocol for the induction of recipient endometrial cycles in an oocyte donation programme

By Michalas S.   Loutradis D.   Drakakis P.   Kallianidis K.   Milingos S.   Deligeoroglou E.   Aravantinos D.  

Human Reproduction, Vol. 11, Iss. 5, 1996-05 ,pp. : 1063-1066

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite