Rapid Analysis of Amphetamine, Methamphetamine, MDA, and MDMA in Urine Using Solid-Phase Microextraction, Direct On-Fiber Derivatization, and Analysis by GCâ–“MS

By Jurado C.   Giménez M.P.   Soriano T.   Menéndez M.   Repetto M.  

Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Vol. 24, Iss. 1, 2000-01 ,pp. : 11-16

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

TECHNICAL NOTE: Prevalence of Use Study for Amphetamine (AMP), Methamphetamine (MAMP), 3,4-Methylenedioxy-amphetamine (MDA), 3,4-Methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA), and 3,4-Methylenedioxy-ethylamphetamine (MDEA) in Military Entrance Processing Stations (MEPS) Specimens

By Klette Kevin L.   Kettle Aaron R.   Jamerson Matthew H.  

Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Vol. 30, Iss. 5, 2006-06 ,pp. : 319-322

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Concentrations and Ratios of Amphetamine, Methamphetamine, MDA, MDMA, and MDEA Enantiomers Determined in Plasma Samples from Clinical Toxicology and Driving Under the Influence of Drugs Cases by GC-NICI-MS

By Peters F.T.  

Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Vol. 27, Iss. 8, 2003-11 ,pp. : 552-559

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Enantiomeric Separation and Quantitation of (±)-Amphetamine, (±)-Methamphetamine, (±)-MDA, (±)-MDMA, and (±)-MDEA in Urine Specimens by GC–EI-MS after Derivatization with (R)-(–)- or (S)-(+)-α-Methoxy-α-(trifluoromethy)phenylacetyl Chloride

By Paul Buddha D.  

Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Vol. 28, Iss. 6, 2004-09 ,pp. : 449-455

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Extraction of Amphetamine and Methamphetamine from Urine Specimens with Cerex Polycromª Clin II Solid-Phase Extraction Columns and the Speediskª 48 Pressure Processor*

By Churley M.   Robandt P.V.   Kuhnle J.A.   Lyons T.P.   Bruins M.R.  

Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Vol. 26, Iss. 6, 2002-09 ,pp. : 347-354

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite