Author: Saner Marc A.
Publisher: Inderscience Publishers
ISSN: 0963-6048
Source: International Journal of Biotechnology, Vol.4, Iss.1, 2003-07, pp. : 81-95
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The debate over the precautionary principle is intimately linked with values and worldviews. I examine how diverging conceptions of "the good world" affect the conceptualisation of the precautionary principle. Three complementary conceptualisations emerge; 1) a call for a change in attitude, 2) a prescription for formalistic action and 3) guidance for contextual action. I apply these conceptualisations to two extreme forms of implementations, a minimal and maximum change approach. I conclude by conducting risk evaluations of the second order. What are the risks of implementing the precautionary principle into risk evaluation?
Related content
Biotechnology and the precautionary principle
International Journal of Biotechnology, Vol. 4, Iss. 1, 2003-07 ,pp. :
The precautionary principle and biotechnology
International Journal of Biotechnology, Vol. 4, Iss. 1, 2003-07 ,pp. :