Comparison of Lifecorder EX and ActiGraph accelerometers under free-living conditions

By McClain James J.   Craig Cora L.   Sisson Susan B.   Tudor-Locke Catrine  

Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, Vol. 32, Iss. 4, 2007-08 ,pp. : 753-761

NRC Research Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Validation of the Kenz Lifecorder EX and ActiGraph GT1M accelerometers for walking and running in adults

By Abel Mark G.   Hannon James C.   Sell Katie   Lillie Tia   Conlin Geri   Anderson David  

Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, Vol. 33, Iss. 6, 2008-12 ,pp. : 1155-1164

NRC Research Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparison of three models of actigraph accelerometers during free living and controlled laboratory conditions

By Lee Ka-Yiu   Macfarlane Duncan J.   Cerin Ester  

European Journal of Sport Science, Vol. 13, Iss. 3, 2013-05 ,pp. : 332-339

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Interaction between body weight status and walking speed in steps monitoring by GT3X accelerometer

By Bélanger Marie-Lyse   Kestens Yan   Gilbert Jo-Anne   Tremblay Angelo   Mathieu Marie-Eve  

Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, Vol. 39, Iss. 8, 2014-01 ,pp. : 976-979

NRC Research Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparison of Goldmann applanation and applanation resonance tonometry in a biomicroscope-based <i>in vitro</i> porcine eye model

By Hallberg P.   Santala K.   Lindén C.   Lindahl O. A.   Eklund A.  

Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, Vol. 30, Iss. 6, 2006-11 ,pp. : 345-352

Informa Healthcare

Access to resources Recommend Favorite