Publisher: Springer Publishing Company
ISSN: 0048-5829
Source: Public Choice, Vol.94, Iss.1-2, 1998-01, pp. : 105-115
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Consider a government that adopts a program, sees a noisy signal about its success, and decides whether to continue the program. Suppose further that the success of a program is greater if people think it will be continued. This paper considers outcomes when government cannot commit. We find that welfare can be higher when information is poor, that government should at times commit to continuing a program it believes had failed, and that a government which fears losing power may acquire either too much or too little information.
Related content
Nietzschean Development Failures
Public Choice, Vol. 119, Iss. 3-4, 2004-06 ,pp. :
The Niger Delta crisis and the roles of governmental agencies in Nigeria
African Identities, Vol. 12, Iss. 2, 2014-04 ,pp. :
Lessons Learned from Nonproliferation Successes and Failures
By Katz J. I.
Comparative Strategy, Vol. 27, Iss. 5, 2008-10 ,pp. :