

Author: Tait Joyce Bruce Ann
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 1469-8331
Source: Health, Risk & Society, Vol.3, Iss.1, 2001-03, pp. : 99-112
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Globalisation of food production systems and accompanying pressures for trade liberalisation are raising new issues for risk regulation and also placing greater demands on risk regulatory systems. Transboundary food-related risks are categorised here as 'traded' risks, subdivided into those which are product-based and those which are production system based. The international systems for regulating the risks of pesticide residues in food and of GM crops are summarised and examples are given of how the risks are monitored and evaluated. For GM crops and pesticides, although in different proportions, concerns focus on risks inherent in food products themselves and in the food production systems of which they form components. Different public motivations (self-interest versus fundamental values) underlie the expressions of concern and different approaches are needed for resolution and public reassurance in each case. We propose an approach which assigns legitimate and clearly specified roles to the two approaches, product based and production system based, which would elevate the debate about GM crops to a higher systemic level where it may have a greater chance of being resolved.
Related content








Risk, Health and Globalisation: a special issue
Health, Risk & Society, Vol. 3, Iss. 1, 2001-03 ,pp. :


Genetically Modified T Cells for the Treatment of Malignant Disease
Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy, Vol. 40, Iss. 6, 2013-11 ,pp. :