Microbiopsies of Surface Dental Enamel as a Tool to Measure Body Lead Burden

Author： Polido Kaneshiro Olympio Kelly Naozuka Juliana Magalhaes Ana Carolina Valentim de Pera Garcia Manuel Vitoriano de Oliveira Pedro Afonso Rabelo Buzalaf Marilia Henriques Bechara Etelvino Risso Gunther Wanda

Publisher： Taylor & Francis Ltd

ISSN： 1087-2620

Source： Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Vol.73, Iss.9, 2010-01, pp. : 627-636

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Lead (Pb) poisoning is preventable but continues to be a public health problem in several countries. Measuring Pb in the surface dental enamel (SDE) using microbiopsies is a rapid, safe, and painless procedure. There are different protocols to perform these microbiopsies, but the reliability of dental enamel lead levels (DELL) determination is dependent upon biopsy depth (BD). It is established that DELL decrease from the outermost superficial layer to the inner layer of dental enamel. The aim of this study was to determine DELL obtained by two different microbiopsy techniques on SDE termed protocol I and protocol II. Two consecutive enamel layers were removed from the same subject group (n = 138) for both protocols. Protocol I consisted of a biopsied site with a diameter of 4 mm after the application of 10 μl HCl for 35 s. Protocol II involved a biopsied site of 1.6 mm diameter after application of 5 μl HCl for 20 s. The results demonstrated that there were no significant differences for BD and DELL between homologous teeth using protocol I. However, there was a significant difference between DELL in the first and second layers using both protocols. Further, the BD in protocol II overestimated DELL values. In conclusion, SDE analyzed by microbiopsy is a reliable biomarker in protocol I, but the chemical method to calculate BD in protocol II appeared to be inadequate for measurement of DELL. Thus, DELL could not be compared among studies that used different methodologies for SDE microbiopsies.