A comparison of 30‐day surgical outcomes for minimally invasive and open sacrocolpopexy

E-ISSN： 1520-6777|34|2|151-155

ISSN： 0733-2467

Source： NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, Vol.34, Iss.2, 2015-02, pp. : 151-155

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Comparison of surgical outcomes between open and robot‐assisted minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy

JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, Vol. 25, Iss. 2, 2018-02 ,pp. : 142-149

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Laparoscopy‐assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy as minimally invasive surgery for periampullary tumors: a comparison of short‐term clinical outcomes of laparoscopy‐assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy

JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, Vol. 22, Iss. 12, 2015-12 ,pp. : 819-824

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Minimally invasive versus the conventional open surgical approach of a radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer: a retrospective comparative study

HPB, Vol. 17, Iss. 6, 2015-06 ,pp. : 536-541

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparison between minimally invasive and open living donor hepatectomy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Vol. 21, Iss. 6, 2015-06 ,pp. : 738-752

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Systems for tracking minimally invasive surgical instruments

By Chmarra M. K. Grimbergen C. A. Dankelman J.

Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies, Vol. 16, Iss. 6, 2007-01 ,pp. : 328-340

Informa Healthcare

Access to resources Recommend Favorite