When and Why Correcting Validity Coefficients for Interrater Reliability Makes Sense

E-ISSN： 1754-9434|7|4|501-506

ISSN： 1754-9426

Source： Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol.7, Iss.4, 2014-12, pp. : 501-506

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

Increasing Interrater Reliability Using Composite Performance Measures

By Wilmot Michael P. Wiernik Brenton M. Kostal Jack W.

Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 7, Iss. 4, 2014-12 ,pp. : 539-542

Blackwell Publishing

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Antisense technology makes more sense of staphylococcal genes

By Michie C.A.

Trends in Immunology, Vol. 22, Iss. 11, 2001-11 ,pp. : 598-598

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

When Correcting for Unreliability of Job Performance Ratings, the Best Estimate Is Still .52

By Shen Winny Cucina Jeffrey M. Walmsley Philip T. Seltzer Benjamin K.

Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 7, Iss. 4, 2014-12 ,pp. : 519-524

Blackwell Publishing

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Correcting the Correction: When Individual Raters Offer Distinct but Valid Perspectives

By Putka Dan J. Hoffman Brian J. Carter Nathan T.

Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 7, Iss. 4, 2014-12 ,pp. : 543-548

Blackwell Publishing

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Pre- and posttransplant immunologic monitoring: why, when, and how?

By Masri M.A. Stephan A. Barbari S. Rizk A. Kamel G.

Transplantation Proceedings, Vol. 34, Iss. 6, 2002-09 ,pp. : 2482-2484

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite