Related content

“Ought” from “Is” 1 I am grateful for criticisms of an earlier version from Mr. R. M. Hare (who kindly showed me a paper of his own on the earlier part of Searle's specimen argument), Dr. A. Sloman, Mr. R. G. Swinburne, Professor A. R. White and Mr. C. J. F. Williams.

By Montague Roger  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 43, Iss. 2, 1965-01 ,pp. : 144-167

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Definition by internal relation 1 I am grateful to Professor Sidney Morgenbesser for his helpful criticisms of earlier drafts of the following paper; he is of course not responsible for any errors which may remain.

By Jarvis Judith  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 39, Iss. 2, 1961-08 ,pp. : 125-142

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

What is a question? 1 For critical comments on an earlier version of this paper I am especially indebted to J. F. Bennett, N. L. Cooper and R. Routley.

By Llewelyn John  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 42, Iss. 1, 1964-01 ,pp. : 69-85

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Ought, obligation and duty 1 I am indebted to Prof. P. Herbst for helpful discussions on this subject, and to Dr. J. Burnheim, Mr. S. I. Benn, Prof. R. L. Franklin and Mr. G. Molnar for helpful comments on earlier versions of the paper.

By Beran Harry  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 50, Iss. 3, 1972-12 ,pp. : 207-221

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A defence of the received interpretation of J. S. Mill*I would like to thank Prof. Leon Ellsworth for reading an earlier draft of this paper and offering several helpful comments.

By Cupples Brian  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 50, Iss. 2, 1972-08 ,pp. : 131-137

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite