Rejoinder: a reply to comments on “should consumers request cost transparency?”

Publisher： Emerald Group Publishing Ltd

E-ISSN： 1758-7123|49|11-12|1999-2003

ISSN： 0309-0566

Source： European Journal of Marketing, Vol.49, Iss.11-12, 2015-11, pp. : 1999-2003

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Should consumers request cost transparency?

By  

European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 49, Iss. 11-12, 2015-11 ,pp. : 1961-1979

Emerald Group Publishing Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Commentary: is cost transparency necessarily good for consumers?

By  

European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 49, Iss. 11-12, 2015-11 ,pp. : 1980-1986

Emerald Group Publishing Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Service-dominant logic: a rejoinder to Lusch and Vargo's reply

By O'Shaughnessy John   O'Shaughnessy Nicholas Jackson  

European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 45, Iss. 7-8, 2011-07 ,pp. : 1310-1318

Emerald Group Publishing Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Commentary: what’s behind the price tag: understanding cost transparency?

By  

European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 49, Iss. 11-12, 2015-11 ,pp. : 1987-1991

Emerald Group Publishing Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Search Cost and Rural Producers' Trading Choice between Middlemen and Consumers in Bangladesh

By Chowdhury Shyamal K.  

Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics JITE, Vol. 160, Iss. 3, 2004-09 ,pp. : 522-541

Mohr Siebeck

Access to resources Recommend Favorite