A Critique of the Doctrine of Universal Salvation

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN: 1469-901x|6|4|329-344

ISSN: 0034-4125

Source: Religious Studies, Vol.6, Iss.4, 1970-12, pp. : 329-344

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Three basic attitudes toward human destiny have precipitated out of the modern theological mentality: double predestination, Arminianism, and universalism. Of the three, Arminianism and double predestination have been unacceptable to a large segment of modern protestantism. The result is that universalism, in one form or another, has assumed wide popularity in recent years. The doctrine has become what might be called an article in the popular creed. But since the influence of universalism has come about largely through default, its explicit formulation has remained incommensurate with its popularity and importance.