Publisher: Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN: 1469-901x|7|4|361-373
ISSN: 0034-4125
Source: Religious Studies, Vol.7, Iss.4, 1971-12, pp. : 361-373
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Of all the arguments for the existence of God, the argument from design is in many respects the most impressive, as everyone remarks that Kant remarked. Certainly it is an argument which seems to have appealed to the popular imagination and even today does not lack philosophical proponents. The purpose of the present paper is to examine a recent formulation of the argument. In particular I shall be concerned to bring into the open its dualist assumptions and to show how these militate against its general plausibility.
Related content
Design—A Further Reply to R. G. Swinburne
Religious Studies, Vol. 9, Iss. 2, 1973-06 ,pp. :
The Argument from Design—a Defence
Religious Studies, Vol. 8, Iss. 3, 1972-09 ,pp. :
Some Reflections on Richard Swinburne's Argument from Design
Religious Studies, Vol. 29, Iss. 3, 1993-09 ,pp. :
Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 43, Iss. 2, 1965-01 ,pp. :
Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 59, Iss. 4, 1981-12 ,pp. :