Publisher： Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN： 1469-901x|17|4|487-497
ISSN： 0034-4125
Source： Religious Studies, Vol.17, Iss.4, 1981-12, pp. : 487-497
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Related content
A Contextualist Reply to the Direct Argument
Philosophical Studies, Vol. 125, Iss. 1, 2005-07 ,pp. :
Access to resources
Recommend
‘Meaning’, experience and the ontological argument
Religious Studies, Vol. 15, Iss. 1, 1979-03 ,pp. :
The Argument from Religious Experience
Religious Studies, Vol. 11, Iss. 3, 1975-09 ,pp. :
The fate of the direct argument and the case for incompatibilism
By Shabo Seth
Philosophical Studies, Vol. 150, Iss. 3, 2010-09 ,pp. :
Religion, Experience and Privacy
Religious Studies, Vol. 20, Iss. 1, 1984-03 ,pp. :