JUDICIAL REVIEW AND CLOSED MATERIAL PROCEDURE IN THE SUPREME COURT

Publisher： Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN： 1469-2139|72|3|491-494

ISSN： 0008-1973

Source： Cambridge Law Journal, Vol.72, Iss.3, 2013-11, pp. : 491-494

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

Whistleblowing protections and judicial activism in the US Supreme Court

By Gilligan George  

Law and Financial Markets Review, Vol. 8, Iss. 1, 2014-03 ,pp. : 4-7

Hart Publishing

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Procedure and Substance in Judicial Review

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 56, Iss. 2, 1997-07 ,pp. : 246-248

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Flaw in Procedure Fatal to Claim—Revised Rules of the Supreme Court

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 21, Iss. 2, 1963-11 ,pp. : 172-173

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

“This Argument Fails for Two Reasons…”: A Linguistic Analysis of Judicial Evaluation Strategies in US Supreme Court Judgments

By Mazzi Davide  

International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, Vol. 23, Iss. 4, 2010-12 ,pp. : 373-385

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Status of Non-Implemented EEA Law in Iceland: Lessons from the Judicial Reactions of the Supreme Court to International Law

By Hannesson Ólafur Ísberg  

Nordic Journal of International Law, Vol. 80, Iss. 4, 2011-10 ,pp. : 425-458

Martinus Nijhoff

Access to resources Recommend Favorite