Team Reading (Peer Review) of Suspicious/Positive Slides for Continuous Quality Improvement in Cervical-Vaginal Cytology: A Comparison between Methods and Indicators

Publisher： Karger

E-ISSN： 1938-2650|60|5|458-464

ISSN： 0001-5547

Source： Acta Cytologica, Vol.60, Iss.5, 2016-08, pp. : 458-464

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

External Quality Assurance in Cervical/Vaginal Cytology

By  

Acta Cytologica, Vol. 40, Iss. 3, 2011-09 ,pp. : 480-488

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparison of False Negative Rates Between 100% Rapid Review and 10% Random Full Rescreening as Internal Quality Control Methods in Cervical Cytology Screening

By  

Acta Cytologica, Vol. 53, Iss. 3, 2011-02 ,pp. : 271-276

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Collagen Balls in Cervical-Vaginal Smears

By  

Acta Cytologica, Vol. 49, Iss. 3, 2011-02 ,pp. : 262-264

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Concordance Between Original Screening and Final Diagnosis Using Imager vs. Manual Screen of Cervical Liquid-Based Cytology Slides

By  

Acta Cytologica, Vol. 52, Iss. 5, 2011-02 ,pp. : 575-578

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Relationship between Positive Peritoneal Cytology and the Prognosis of Patients with Uterine Cervical Cancer

By  

Acta Cytologica, Vol. 59, Iss. 2, 2015-05 ,pp. : 201-206

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite