Comparison of methods to determine CTOD for SENB specimens in different strain hardening steels

E-ISSN： 1460-2695|41|3|551-564

ISSN： 8756-758x

Source： FATIGUE & FRACTURE OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, Vol.41, Iss.3, 2018-03, pp. : 551-564

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Strain hardening at different temperatures

By Cottrell A.

Philosophical Magazine Letters, Vol. 89, Iss. 1, 2009-01 ,pp. : 19-22

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparison of X-ray analysis methods used to determine the grain size and strain in nanocrystalline materials

By Ian H. H. T Atzmon M.

Philosophical Magazine. A. Physics of Condensed Matter. Defects and Mechanical Properties, Vol. 79, Iss. 8, 1999-08 ,pp. : 1769-1786

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Strain Hardening Behavior Prediction Model For Automotive High Strength Multiphase Steels

STEEL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, Vol. 86, Iss. 12, 2015-12 ,pp. : 1574-1582

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Simulation of low cycle fatigue stress‐strain response in 316LN stainless steel using non‐linear isotropic kinematic hardening model—A comparison of different approaches

FATIGUE & FRACTURE OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, Vol. 41, Iss. 2, 2018-02 ,pp. : 336-347

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Effects of different indentation methods on fatigue life extension of cracked specimens

FATIGUE & FRACTURE OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, Vol. 41, Iss. 2, 2018-02 ,pp. : 287-299

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite