Related content

Discussion paper: Reaction to Hamer and Thompson in LPR

By Berger Charles E.H.   Sjerps Marjan J.  

Law, Probability and Risk, Vol. 11, Iss. 4, 2012-12 ,pp. : 373-375

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Sharing homes: a law commission discussion paper with a difference

By McDonald Iain  

Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, Vol. 25, Iss. 1, 2003-02 ,pp. : 83-96

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Discussion paper: The R v T controversy: forensic evidence, law and logic

By Hamer David  

Law, Probability and Risk, Vol. 11, Iss. 4, 2012-12 ,pp. : 331-345

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Discussion paper: Hard cases make bad lawreactions to R v T

By Thompson William C.  

Law, Probability and Risk, Vol. 11, Iss. 4, 2012-12 ,pp. : 347-359

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Counterblast: Some Discussion of the Home Office Discussion Paper ‘Opportunity/Security as a Driver of Crime’

By  

The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, Vol. 54, Iss. 5, 2015-12 ,pp. : 521-525

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite