Reflections on How We Live , by Annette C. Baier.

By Kekes John  

Mind, Vol. 120, Iss. 479, 2011-07 ,pp. : 845-848

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Atheism and Freedom: A Response to Sartre and Baier

By  

Religious Studies, Vol. 20, Iss. 2, 1984-06 ,pp. : 281-291

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

For Better or For Worse? Collaborative Couples in the Sciences ‐ edited by Annette Lykknes, Donald L. Opitz and Brigitte Van Tiggelen

By  

CENTAURUS, Vol. 57, Iss. 1, 2015-02 ,pp. : 29-31

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Are there any incorrigible empirical statements? 1 There is an excellent discussion of this question in A. J. Ayer's The Problem of Knowledge , Chapter 2, Sections (iv), (v), and (vi), which mentions almost all the relevant considerations. However, it seems to me to stress some of the less important points and merely to mention what I regard as the crucial argument. I refer to this discussion by the pages in the Pelican edition. The case against incorrigibility is argued also by J. L. Austin (against John Wisdom) in ‘Other Minds', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society , Supplementary Volume XX, reprinted in Austin's Philosophical Papers ; I refer to the pages in the latter publication. The question is raised again by the controversy between J. J. C. Smart and Kurt Baier about the status of pains and other sensations in A.J.P. , Vol. 40, No. 1, May, 1962.

By Mackie J.L.  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 41, Iss. 1, 1963-01 ,pp. : 12-28

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite