The impact of different types of expert scientific testimony on mock jurors' liability verdicts

Author： Brian H. Bornstein  

Publisher： Routledge Ltd

ISSN： 1068-316X

Source： Psychology, Crime and Law, Vol.10, Iss.4, 2004-12, pp. : 429-446

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Comparing the effects of explicit and implicit false-evidence ploys on Mock Jurors' verdicts, sentencing recommendations, and perceptions of police interrogation

By      

Psychology, Crime and Law, Vol. 20, Iss. 6, 2014-07 ,pp. : 603-617

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Jurors believe interrogation tactics are not likely to elicit false confessions: will expert witness testimony inform them otherwise?

By Blandon-Gitlin Iris  

Psychology, Crime and Law, Vol. 17, Iss. 3, 2011-03 ,pp. : 239-260

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Impact of Expert Testimony on the Believability of Repressed Memories

By Sugarman David B.   Boney-McCoy Sue  

Violence and Victims, Vol. 12, Iss. 2, 1997-01 ,pp. : 115-126

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Mock jurors' perceptions of identifications made by intoxicated eyewitnesses

By Evans Jacqueline Renee  

Psychology, Crime and Law, Vol. 16, Iss. 3, 2010-02 ,pp. : 191-210

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A qualitative investigation of mock-jurors' theories of emotion and reason

By Spackman Matthew P.   Belcher Jann C.   Cramer Lauren   Delton Yohan  

Cognition and Emotion, Vol. 20, Iss. 5, 2006-08 ,pp. : 671-693

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite