A response to Göransson and Nilholm

ISSN： 0885-6257

Source： European Journal of Special Needs Education, Vol.29, Iss.3, 2014-07, pp. : 281-282

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

Empirical shortcomings? A comment on Kerstin Göransson and Claes Nilholm, ‘Conceptual diversities and empirical shortcomings - a critical analysis of research on inclusive education’

By Haug Peder

European Journal of Special Needs Education, Vol. 29, Iss. 3, 2014-07 ,pp. : 283-285

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A Response

By Wilson John

Journal of Moral Education, Vol. 29, Iss. 3, 2000-09 ,pp. : 371-375

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Debate response

By Thorpe Mary

Open Learning, Vol. 19, Iss. 3, 2004-11 ,pp. : 311-317

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Critique and Response

By Tilak Jandhyala Colclough Christopher

International Review of Education / Internationale Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft / Revue internationale de l'éducation, Vol. 51, Iss. 1, 2005-01 ,pp. : 73-83

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Rhizovocality response

By Steedly Kathlyn

International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, Vol. 16, Iss. 5, 2003-09 ,pp. : 729-730

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite