Publisher： Oxford University Press
Founded in： 2002
Total resources： 4
E-ISSN： 1470-840X
ISSN： 1470-8396
Subject： D9 Law
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Law, Probability and Risk
Menu
The Eighth International Conference on Forensic Inference and Statistics
Law, Probability and Risk , Vol. 12, Iss. 1, 2013-03 , pp.
Access to resources
Recommend
Pain and suffering quantified: Judge Weinsteins concept of similarity between cases
By Stern Rafael B.,Kadane Joseph B. in (2013)
Law, Probability and Risk , Vol. 12, Iss. 1, 2013-03 , pp.Proficiency tests to estimate error rates in the forensic sciences
By Koehler Jonathan J. in (2013)
Law, Probability and Risk , Vol. 12, Iss. 1, 2013-03 , pp.Properties of statistical tests appropriate for the analysis of data in disparate impact cases
By Miao Weiwen,Gastwirth Joseph L. in (2013)
Law, Probability and Risk , Vol. 12, Iss. 1, 2013-03 , pp.By Pan Qing,Gastwirth Joseph L. in (2013)
Law, Probability and Risk , Vol. 12, Iss. 1, 2013-03 , pp.Reservations about likelihood ratios (and some other aspects of forensic Bayesianism)
By Michael Risinger D. in (2013)
Law, Probability and Risk , Vol. 12, Iss. 1, 2013-03 , pp.Discussion paper: Reaction to Hamer and Thompson in LPR
By Berger Charles E.H.,Sjerps Marjan J. in (2012)
Law, Probability and Risk , Vol. 11, Iss. 4, 2012-12 , pp.A short reply on the discussion by D. Hamer
By Nordgaard Anders,Rasmusson Birgitta in (2012)
Law, Probability and Risk , Vol. 11, Iss. 4, 2012-12 , pp.Discussion paper: Hard cases make bad lawreactions to R v T
By Thompson William C. in (2012)
Law, Probability and Risk , Vol. 11, Iss. 4, 2012-12 , pp.
Previous
Next