A short reply on the discussion by D. Hamer

Author： Nordgaard Anders Rasmusson Birgitta

ISSN： 1470-8396

Source： Law, Probability and Risk, Vol.11, Iss.4, 2012-12, pp. : 371-371

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

Discussion paper: Reaction to Hamer and Thompson in LPR

By Berger Charles E.H. Sjerps Marjan J.

Law, Probability and Risk, Vol. 11, Iss. 4, 2012-12 ,pp. : 373-375

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Reply to Hamer: The R v T controversy: forensic evidence, law and logic

By Biedermann A. Taroni F. Champod C.

Law, Probability and Risk, Vol. 11, Iss. 4, 2012-12 ,pp. : 361-362

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

By van den Haag Ernest

Justice Quarterly, Vol. 1, Iss. 4, 1984-12 ,pp. : 581-584

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The short tandem repeat locus D3S1359

By Rogers R.D. Griffin S.T. Louis O. Velkeniers B. Van Haelst L. Osteaux M. Poltl R. Luckenbach C. Ritter H.

Forensic Science International, Vol. 95, Iss. 2, 1998-07 ,pp. : 163-168

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Summary of the Discussion

By Author A.

Forensic Science International, Vol. 88, Iss. 1, 1997-07 ,pp. : 99-105

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite