On the Closeness Aspect of Three Voting Rules: Borda – Copeland – Maximin

ISSN： 0926-2644

Source： Group Decision and Negotiation, Vol.14, Iss.3, 2005-05, pp. : 233-240

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Can Co-Owners Agree to Disagree? A Theoretical Examination of Voting Rules in Co-Ownerships

By Ben-Shahar Danny Sulganik Eyal

The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Vol. 31, Iss. 2, 2005-09 ,pp. : 207-223

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Three proven rules: discovering how exceptional companies think

By Raynor Michael E. Ahmed Mumtaz

Strategy and Leadership, Vol. 41, Iss. 3, 2013-04 ,pp. : 5-10

Emerald Group Publishing Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Reinventing the rules of engagement: three strategies for winning the information technology race

By Berman Saul Marshall Anthony

Strategy and Leadership, Vol. 42, Iss. 4, 2014-07 ,pp. : 22-32

Emerald Group Publishing Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

On the Kim and Roush Voting Procedure

By Lepelley D.

Group Decision and Negotiation, Vol. 8, Iss. 2, 1999-03 ,pp. : 109-123

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Voting Paradoxes and MCDM

By Nurmi H.

Group Decision and Negotiation, Vol. 9, Iss. 4, 2000-07 ,pp. : 297-313

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite