“This Argument Fails for Two Reasons…”: A Linguistic Analysis of Judicial Evaluation Strategies in US Supreme Court Judgments

Author： Mazzi Davide  

Publisher： Springer Publishing Company

ISSN： 0952-8059

Source： International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, Vol.23, Iss.4, 2010-12, pp. : 373-385

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Whistleblowing protections and judicial activism in the US Supreme Court

By Gilligan George  

Law and Financial Markets Review, Vol. 8, Iss. 1, 2014-03 ,pp. : 4-7

Hart Publishing

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

US Supreme Court Fails to Clarify ‘Standing’ Doctrine in Consumer Privacy Case

By Rotenberg Marc   Thomson Aimee  

European Data Protection Law Review (EDPL), Vol. 2, Iss. 3, 2016-09 ,pp. : 428-431

Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

JUDICIAL REVIEW AND CLOSED MATERIAL PROCEDURE IN THE SUPREME COURT

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 72, Iss. 3, 2013-11 ,pp. : 491-494

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The U.S. Supreme Court An Introductory Note

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 29, Iss. 1, 1971-04 ,pp. : 134-147

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Status of Non-Implemented EEA Law in Iceland: Lessons from the Judicial Reactions of the Supreme Court to International Law

By Hannesson Ólafur Ísberg  

Nordic Journal of International Law, Vol. 80, Iss. 4, 2011-10 ,pp. : 425-458

Martinus Nijhoff

Access to resources Recommend Favorite