Further dogged defense of paraphyletic taxa

Publisher： International Association for Plant Taxonomy

ISSN： 1996-8175

Source： Taxon, Vol.52, Iss.4, 2003-11, pp. : 803-804

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

Paraphyletic taxa should be accepted

Taxon, Vol. 54, Iss. 1, 2005-02 ,pp. : 5-8

International Association for Plant Taxonomy

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Further arguments for the rejection of paraphyletic taxa: Veronica subgen. Pseudolysimachium (Plantaginaceae)

By Albach Dirk C.

Taxon, Vol. 57, Iss. 1, 2008-02 ,pp. : 1-6

International Association for Plant Taxonomy

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Pursuit of a natural classification of diatoms: History, monophyly and the rejection of paraphyletic taxa

By Williams David M. Kociolek J. Patrick

European Journal of Phycology, Vol. 42, Iss. 3, 2007-08 ,pp. : 313-319

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Paraphyletic versus monophyletic taxa—evolutionary versus cladistic classifications

By Hörandl Elvira

Taxon, Vol. 55, Iss. 3, 2006-08 ,pp. : 564-570

International Association for Plant Taxonomy

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Opinion: Can coalescent models explain deep divergences in the diatoms and argue for the acceptance of paraphyletic taxa at all taxonomic hierarchies?

By Medlin Linda K.

Nova Hedwigia, Vol. 102, Iss. 1-2, 2016-02 ,pp. : 107-128

E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung

Access to resources Recommend Favorite