Author： Biedermann A. Taroni F. Champod C.
Publisher： Oxford University Press
ISSN： 1470-8396
Source： Law, Probability and Risk, Vol.11, Iss.4, 2012-12, pp. : 361-362
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Related content
Discussion paper: The R v T controversy: forensic evidence, law and logic
By Hamer David
Law, Probability and Risk, Vol. 11, Iss. 4, 2012-12 ,pp. :
Access to resources
Recommend
A short reply on the discussion by D. Hamer
By Nordgaard Anders Rasmusson Birgitta
Law, Probability and Risk, Vol. 11, Iss. 4, 2012-12 ,pp. :
Discussion paper: Hard cases make bad lawreactions to R v T
Law, Probability and Risk, Vol. 11, Iss. 4, 2012-12 ,pp. :
Don't Mention the War! R. v Bottrill, ex parte Kuchenmeister (1946) Revisited
By Rubin Gerry
The Journal of Legal History, Vol. 29, Iss. 3, 2008-12 ,pp. :