

Author: Lewis J.
Publisher: Springer Publishing Company
ISSN: 0957-8765
Source: Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, Vol.10, Iss.3, 1999-09, pp. : 255-270
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
There have been three major analytical reviews that have examined the voluntary–statutory relationship during the 1990s, one undertaken by government in 1990 and the other two independently in 1993 and 1996. This article suggests that an historical understanding of this relationship (especially in terms of its sociopolitical dimensions) is crucial, but was missing from the 1990 review and misrepresented by the 1993 review. The 1996 document has been subjected to harsh criticism, but it was arguably sounder in its understanding of this fundamental issue. The national compact between representatives of the voluntary sector and the state, launched at the end of 1998, has built upon the arguments put forward in 1996. However, the paper suggests that given the vexed history of “partnership” between the sectors and the extent to which the statutory sector has become the dominant partner at the end of the 20th century, it would be premature to be overly optimistic. The paper examines three major shifts in the voluntary–statutory relationship during the 20th century, before reviewing the 1990s' documents in more detail.
Related content


By Coleman Lester Bauer Elaine Houlston Catherine Edwards Rosalind
Families, Relationships and Societies, Vol. 1, Iss. 2, 2012-06 ,pp. :




Splintering Networks: Cities and Technical Networks in 1990s Britain
By Guy Simon Graham Stephen Marvin Simon
Urban Studies, Vol. 34, Iss. 2, 1997-02 ,pp. :


Change, HRM and the voluntary sector
By Hay Gillian Kellock Beattie Rona S Livingstone Ron Munro Pauline
Employee Relations, Vol. 23, Iss. 3, 2001-06 ,pp. :


Social Work Education, Vol. 13, Iss. 1, 1994-01 ,pp. :